Sunday, May 7, 2023

A GPT4 Script About a Writer's Strike

Write a script (treatment) for a movie about a newly-begun writer's strike of movie and tv writers.  Include interesting or unexpected characterers, quirky situations and plot twists.   

Let me know in your introduction (sort of an elevator pitch) what the spin is.  If possible, provide the first few paragraphs.   It could be presented in the format of a script OR a novel, either one.


[Note - AI is not very good at scripts; so far nobody has to worry about his/her job.]

ChatGPT4:

Title: "Ink on the Line"

Elevator Pitch:

"Ink on the Line" is a darkly comedic drama centered around the world of television and movie writers during a major writer's strike. The writers, forced to find creative ways to make ends meet, form an underground writing collective where they secretly continue to write scripts for a mysterious benefactor. As their relationships and personal lives spiral out of control, they must navigate the politics of the strike, avoid being discovered, and deal with the eccentric characters that emerge from the underground world they've created. In the end, the true identity of their benefactor is revealed, upending everything they thought they knew about the industry and themselves.

Opening Scene:

INT. WRITERS' GUILD HEADQUARTERS - NIGHT

A dimly lit, smoke-filled room bustles with anxious WRITERS murmuring and debating as they hold picket signs. Camera pans to a man standing at the head of the room. This is PETER, mid-40s, a seasoned writer who's passionate about the cause.

PETER

(voice booming)

Alright, everyone, settle down! This is the moment we've been preparing for. The studios have refused to meet our demands. We're officially on strike!

Scattered applause and cheers erupt from the crowd.


EXT. HOLLYWOOD STUDIO - DAY


The WRITERS picket the studio entrance, chanting slogans and waving signs. The camera zooms in on MELISSA, early 30s, an ambitious up-and-coming writer. She's at the front of the line, chanting louder than the rest.

MELISSA

(voice cracking)

No contracts, no scripts! No contracts, no scripts!

INT. MELISSA'S APARTMENT - NIGHT

Melissa sits on the floor, surrounded by half-packed boxes. She frantically dials a number on her phone.

MELISSA

(into phone)

Mom, it's official. We're on strike. I don't know how I'm going to pay rent this month... or the next. I'll figure something out. I have to.

INT. GIOVANNI'S PIZZERIA - DAY

Melissa works the cash register, her eyes glazed over. The bell on the door jingles, and in walks JACOB, 40s, a seasoned writer with a cynical air. He smirks at Melissa.

JACOB

So, this is what it's come to, huh? Writers making pizzas?

Melissa rolls her eyes, clearly annoyed.

MELISSA

Hey, we all have to make a living, don't we?

JACOB

(smiling slyly)

Well, what if I told you there's a way we could keep writing... and get paid for it?

Melissa raises an eyebrow, intrigued.

___________

The story unfolds as the writers navigate the underground world of secret scriptwriting, dealing with oddball characters like "The Critic," a once-respected film critic turned unscrupulous bookie, and "The Producer," a reclusive mogul who funds the whole operation. As the pressure mounts, relationships and loyalties are tested. 

In a final twist, the writers discover that their mysterious benefactor is none other than the head of the Writer's Guild, who has been orchestrating the strike to consolidate [his] power and control the industry. The writers must make a choice: expose the truth and risk their careers, or keep quiet and reap the rewards.

___________

GPT4 Reviews the Movie

   Title: "Ink on the Line" - A Darkly Comedic Journey Through the Shadows of a Writer's Strike

Review:

"Ink on the Line" is a captivating and darkly comedic exploration of the world of television and movie writers, set against the backdrop of a major writer's strike. The film masterfully weaves a tale of ambition, passion, and deception, while also providing an insightful look into the challenges faced by writers in the entertainment industry.

Director Jane Fiori delivers a beautifully shot and deftly paced film, with an exceptional ensemble cast that breathes life into a diverse and intriguing set of characters. The chemistry among the actors is palpable, creating an authentic atmosphere of camaraderie and tension that keeps viewers engaged throughout the film.

The standout performance comes from Melissa, portrayed by up-and-coming actress Emily Smith. Smith's portrayal of a young and ambitious writer caught in the crossfire of the strike is both relatable and heart-wrenching. She effortlessly navigates the complex emotional landscape of her character, providing moments of genuine humor and pathos.

The film's supporting cast is equally impressive, with standout performances from seasoned actors John Stevens as the cynical Jacob and Sarah Thompson as the enigmatic Producer. The characters they encounter in the underground writing collective, such as "The Critic" and "The Producer," are simultaneously quirky and menacing, making for a fascinating and unpredictable narrative.

One of the true strengths of "Ink on the Line" lies in its ability to balance its darker elements with a sharp sense of humor. The dialogue is witty and biting, and the clever use of situational comedy prevents the film from becoming too bleak or heavy-handed.

The final twist, revealing the true identity of the mysterious benefactor, is both shocking and satisfying, leaving viewers questioning the nature of power and control within the entertainment industry. Ultimately, "Ink on the Line" is a testament to the resilience and ingenuity of writers, who continue to find ways to create, even in the face of adversity.

"Ink on the Line" is a must-watch for anyone with an interest in the entertainment industry or a love for dark comedy. With its engaging story, well-rounded characters, and thought-provoking themes, this film will undoubtedly leave a lasting impression on audiences.

GPT4

The Bad Review

  Title: "Ink on the Line" - A Feeble Attempt at Comedy and Drama in a Writer's Strike

Review:

"Ink on the Line" attempts to be a darkly comedic exploration of the entertainment industry, set during a major writer's strike. Unfortunately, despite its aspirations, the film falls short of being either funny or insightful, leaving audiences to wonder if the writers themselves were on strike during its creation.

Director Jane Fiori's muddled vision is riddled with clichés and tired tropes, resulting in a film that struggles to find its own identity. The pacing is uneven, and the cinematography, while occasionally striking, often feels like a film student's desperate attempt to garner attention.

The ensemble cast appears to be an interesting mix of characters on paper, but the result is a group of caricatures lacking depth and nuance. Emily Smith's portrayal of Melissa, the ambitious up-and-coming writer, is as one-dimensional as the cardboard picket signs she waves. While her performance isn't entirely without merit, it's hard to shake the feeling that she's simply going through the motions.

The supporting cast is equally underwhelming. John Stevens' portrayal of the cynical Jacob is so riddled with bitterness that it borders on parody, while Sarah Thompson's enigmatic Producer is about as mysterious as an open book. The underground writing collective they navigate is filled with characters that are not so much quirky as they are irritating. As for the humor, it's as subtle as a sledgehammer and as fresh as last week's pizza.

The film's final twist, meant to shock and provoke, is ultimately as foreseeable as it is derivative. The revelation of the mysterious benefactor's identity is reminiscent of a Scooby-Doo episode, leaving viewers to wonder if they should have been meddling kids instead of film critics.

"Ink on the Line" is a haphazard attempt at dark comedy and drama that never quite finds its footing. The film stumbles through its uninspired plot, hoping that a few moments of levity will make up for its shortcomings. Unfortunately, it seems that the true strike was not against the studios, but against creativity itself.