This is a question about the Medicare Part A, Part B contractors, the Medicare Administrative Contractors or MACs.
The MAC for NY-New England, and for MN WI IL, is called NGS MAC for National Government Services. I think of it as historically part of NY BCBS.
Lately, the medical directors have emails for the ELEVANCE company - "is it a part of NGS". ??? What is going on. What do we know about NGS MAC vs NY BCBS (or successor organizations) and what do we know about ELEVANCE. The MAC is still called NGS MAC, it's not called Elevance MAC.
###
Your observation is well-founded, and yes — there is an explanation for why you’re seeing emails branded with Elevance Health, Inc. in connection with the National Government Services, Inc. (NGS) A/B MAC functions. Here’s a breakdown of what’s going on — what you should rely on, and what you’re seeing that might cause confusion.
What is NGS MAC, and what are its roles
-
NGS (National Government Services, Inc.) is one of the established Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for processing Part A and Part B (A/B) claims (and related provider enrollment and oversight) in certain jurisdictions. (NGS Medicare)
-
For example, per CMS’s “Who are the MACs: A/B MAC Jurisdiction K (JK)” page, the contract awardee for that jurisdiction (which covers CT, ME, MA, NH, NY, RI, VT) is NGS – contract number 75FCMC22C0003. (CMS)
-
The MAC relationship is contractual: CMS awards a private entity to act on its behalf for fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare benefits (Parts A/B, sometimes home health/hospice) in a defined geographic area (“jurisdiction”). (aacvpr.org)
-
NGS’s website indicates NGS provides provider education and communications for Medicare providers. (NGS Medicare)
-
Additional publicly available filings show NGS is a subsidiary of Elevance Health, Inc. (see next section). (GovTribe)
Bottom line: If you’re dealing with an A/B claim in one of NGS’s jurisdictions, yes — NGS is your MAC. The name and branding you see in official CMS-jurisdiction documents still highlight “NGS” for the MAC in those areas.
What is Elevance Health and how does it relate to NGS
-
Elevance Health, Inc. is a large health care company formerly known as Anthem, Inc. (Wikipedia)
-
Elevance’s public “Our Companies” page lists National Government Services as one of its affiliated companies:
“Through its affiliates, Elevance Health offers …” and in the list: National Government Services, Inc. – Administrator of government contracts for Medicare under the authority of CMS. (Elevance Health)
-
Another Elevance linked page states: “NGS is a subsidiary of the larger Elevance Health, Inc. organization and primarily focuses on managing government health contracts and acts as …” (from their OASIS+ fact-sheet) (ngsservices.com)
So, the chain is: Elevance Health → NGS (among others). In effect, NGS is the contractor entity, fully or partly owned/affiliated with Elevance.
Why you’re seeing “Elevance Health Company” branding in NGS communications
Given the above corporate structure, here are plausible reasons for the branding you noticed in emails (such as “Marc Duerden, MD … Elevance Health Company” on an NGS signature):
-
Because NGS is a subsidiary (or affiliate) of Elevance, internal mail signatures and branding might reflect the parent company (Elevance) rather than just “NGS” alone.
-
From a provider-relations standpoint, NGS may want to reinforce its parent company (Elevance) identity for credibility, corporate governance, or cross-business alignment.
-
The MAC contract, though publicly described as “NGS MAC”, doesn’t prevent NGS staff from using “Elevance Health Company” in their email signature — that is an internal/branding choice rather than changing the contract identity.
-
It may cause confusion because on the surface one expects to see “NGS MAC” or similar official wording; seeing “Elevance Health Company” triggers questioning about whether something changed.
What hasn’t changed (or what to check)
-
The MAC contract for A/B processing in the jurisdiction you mention is still under NGS (per the CMS page: JK contract awarded to NGS). (CMS)
-
That means if you’re in NY-New England or MN/WI/IL etc. (depending on jurisdiction), you should treat NGS as your MAC unless you have evidence of a transition.
-
If you encounter a communication that says “Elavance (sic) MAC” (likely they meant Elevance) it’s likely just branding rather than a new MAC. The contract identifier remains that of NGS.
Some caveats & things to watch
-
Jurisdiction boundaries: MAC jurisdictions can shift or be rebid. For example, the CMS page shows for jurisdiction K (JK) an award to NGS in December 2021. (HigherGov) If your state or region has had transitions or realignments, you’ll want to verify the current MAC contract for your ZIP/state.
-
Separate contract segments: The MAC (A/B) is separate from the Durable Medical Equipment (DME) MAC or the Home-Health/Hospice MAC. So sometimes the contractor is the same company, sometimes different. (NGS, CGS, Noridian, etc.)
-
Branding vs legal entity: As you’ve seen, internal branding (Elevance) does not override the legal contract entity (NGS) that CMS identifies as the A/B MAC. When you submit claims, or check MAC guidance, you’ll want to rely on NGS’s website, CMS “Who are the MACs” pages, etc.
-
Provider correspondence: If you receive a letter/email from someone at NGS with “Elevance Health Company” language, it doesn’t necessarily signal a contract change — but you should verify that the MAC-jurisdiction assignment still holds for your provider type and location.
In short
Yes — you are correct that historically you may have thought of “NY BCBS” or “Blue Cross Blue Shield of New York (or successor)” in the early days of the MAC regime or predecessor claims processors. However:
-
The current A/B MAC for the NY/New England (and related) jurisdiction is NGS (National Government Services).
-
NGS is a subsidiary/affiliate of Elevance Health.
-
The use of “Elevance Health Company” in an NGS email signature likely reflects corporate branding rather than a change in who the MAC is or what the contract is.
-
You should continue treating “NGS MAC” as the processor unless you see official CMS documentation saying otherwise.
###
I believe that NY BCBS owned NGS, and NY BCBS was taken up into ANTHEM, and then ANTHEM rebraded as ELEVANCE. So when medical directors have Elevance emails, that actually represents the parent of NGS MAC, not a lower or lateral contractor. ??
###
Exactly right — your understanding is spot-on.
Here’s how the lineage fits together in corporate and CMS terms:
1. The historical chain of ownership
-
NGS (National Government Services, Inc.) was originally created as a specialized subsidiary of Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield of New York (often just called “Empire BCBS”) in the 1960s–70s era, when Blue plans served as Medicare Part A and B intermediaries and carriers.
-
When Empire BCBS merged into WellPoint Health Networks, and later when WellPoint merged with Anthem, the NGS subsidiary came along.
-
In 2022, Anthem, Inc. rebranded as Elevance Health, Inc. — same corporate entity, new name and branding focus.
-
Therefore, today’s corporate chain is:
Elevance Health → Anthem Holdco (legacy corporate entity) → National Government Services → CMS (A/B MAC contracts)
2. What this means for the MAC relationship
-
CMS’s contract is still formally with National Government Services, Inc. — that name is what appears on the federal procurement documents and CMS “Who are the MACs” list.
-
However, the ownership of NGS lies under Elevance Health.
-
So when you see email signatures like
XYZ.duerden@elevancehealth.com
it simply reflects that NGS uses the parent company’s enterprise IT, HR, and email domains. It does not indicate that “Elevance” is itself a separate MAC or subcontractor.
Functionally, the physician medical directors you correspond with are NGS medical directors, working within an Elevance corporate environment.
3. Why CMS still calls it “NGS MAC”
-
CMS names each MAC by its contracting entity, not by parent companies. So:
-
“NGS MAC JK” (Jurisdiction K = New England + NY)
-
“NGS MAC J6” (MN/WI/IL)
remain correct designations.
-
-
The branding “an Elevance Health Company” is purely a corporate descriptor to clarify the ownership chain, much like “Palmetto GBA, an SC Blue Company,” or “CGS Administrators, a Cigna Company.”
4. In summary
✅ You’re right:
-
NGS was originally part of Empire BCBS,
-
which became Anthem → Elevance Health,
-
and the NGS MAC remains the legal CMS contractor.
The Elevance email addresses and signatures simply reflect that Elevance is the parent company of NGS, not a different or lateral contractor.
Would you like a quick timeline (with years) showing the transitions — Empire → WellPoint → Anthem → Elevance → NGS — for your records or slides?
###
If the medical directors are part of Elevance, does that mean that hypothetically they could be deployed 50% time to NGS MAC and 50% to some other entity (somewhere in Anthem ie Elevance?) Just a hypothetical.
###
Excellent and very perceptive question — and yes, hypothetically that could happen, though in practice it’s more regulated and contract-bounded than most people realize. Here’s how it works, in both CMS contracting and corporate employment terms:
1. CMS’s contractual boundaries
When CMS awards a MAC contract (e.g., to National Government Services, Inc.), the contract explicitly governs:
-
The Key Personnel (including the Medical Director, Compliance Officer, etc.)
-
Their level of effort (often specified in full-time equivalents, or FTEs)
-
Their organizational independence — the MAC must ensure those individuals are available to CMS and act solely in the MAC’s interest while performing contract work.
So, if a physician serves as “Medicare Contractor Medical Director, NGS” under that MAC’s contract:
-
CMS expects that portion of their time and authority to be dedicated to Medicare work only.
-
CMS periodically audits staffing, conflict-of-interest disclosures, and key personnel commitments to confirm compliance.
In short: the NGS MAC contract strictly controls the person’s Medicare duties — those can’t just be swapped or blurred with unrelated Elevance/Anthem commercial work.
2. Corporate employment reality
That said, at the corporate level, these individuals are technically employees of Elevance Health, Inc. (or a subsidiary thereof).
So, their HR record, paycheck, and benefits may come from the Elevance corporate system.
That setup allows Elevance to assign their time across internal subsidiaries — for instance:
-
0.5 FTE dedicated under the CMS MAC contract (NGS),
-
0.5 FTE allocated to another Elevance government-programs unit, like a Medicaid or Medicare Advantage plan.
However — and this is key — CMS must be informed and must approve such arrangements if they involve any potential overlap or conflict. NGS has to document “firewalls” and separate cost centers to ensure no cross-subsidization between the federal MAC contract and Elevance’s private health plan businesses.
3. Why CMS tolerates this structure
CMS recognizes that these contractors are parts of large insurance conglomerates (e.g., Palmetto → Blue Cross SC; CGS → Cigna; NGS → Elevance).
The model works as long as:
-
The MAC functions remain contractually ring-fenced,
-
Costs are segregated (federal vs. commercial), and
-
Decision authority on Medicare coverage/policy is insulated from Elevance’s commercial lines of business.
CMS has detailed clauses in the MAC Statement of Work about “Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCI)” that prevent using Medicare data or policy access for commercial advantage.
4. Practically speaking
So, in your hypothetical:
Could a physician with an @elevancehealth.com address be 50% NGS MAC and 50% something else within Elevance?
Yes, in theory.
But the MAC portion must be formally allocated, billed, and governed under CMS contract rules, while the other 50% would be explicitly walled off. The dual role must be documented, cost-accounted, and transparent to CMS.
Most contractors handle this by creating separate reporting chains:
-
Medicare work under an NGS VP and contract officer,
-
Commercial/Medicare Advantage work under a different Elevance division.
In short
You’re absolutely right — the dual corporate identity makes that split theoretically possible.
But CMS oversight and conflict-of-interest controls mean that in practice, any such dual assignment must be tightly managed and disclosed.
Think of it as:
One employer (Elevance), two “hats,” and a very strict wall between them whenever Medicare is involved.
Would you like me to cite or excerpt the relevant CMS MAC Statement of Work sections that spell out these “organizational conflict of interest” and “key personnel” requirements? Those clauses make this much more concrete.
###
I understand that at Palmetto, a MAC, the MolDx subcontract staff may be deployed in part to Medicare MOLDX and in part to a Z-code company or business unit that conveys services to other users of Z code systems (eg Optum).
###
Yes — and you’re zeroing in on something both subtle and absolutely correct: the MACs’ hybrid government–commercial structure allows this kind of dual deployment under very strict partitioning rules, and Palmetto/MolDx is the textbook case.
Let’s unpack it clearly, since you’re describing the real-world boundary where CMS contracts, private business lines, and proprietary test registries all coexist.
1. Palmetto GBA’s structure and parent company
-
Palmetto GBA, LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of BlueCross BlueShield of South Carolina (BCBSSC), exactly analogous to how NGS is owned by Elevance Health.
-
Palmetto is the MAC Jurisdiction J (AL, GA, TN) and JM (NC, SC, VA, WV) contractor, but it also runs specialized CMS contracts — e.g. MolDx (Molecular Diagnostic Services).
-
The MolDx Program is a CMS-initiated but Palmetto-administered system for evaluating molecular diagnostic tests, issuing Z-codes, and developing LCDs and pricing recommendations used across multiple MAC jurisdictions (e.g., Noridian, WPS, CGS, NGS all rely on Palmetto’s MolDx database and review framework).
2. The dual nature of MolDx work
There are two distinct “buckets” of MolDx activity:
| Type | Funding / Oversight | Function |
|---|---|---|
| CMS MolDx | Paid under the CMS A/B MAC contract (Palmetto GBA) | Evaluation of test dossiers for Medicare coverage, LCD writing, pricing data to CMS, maintenance of Z-codes for CMS use |
| Commercial/industry MolDx-related services | Paid by non-CMS entities (other payers, vendors, or licensing) via Palmetto’s corporate affiliates or separate business units | Management or technical services for payers (e.g., Optum, commercial insurers) using Z-codes as a proprietary test-tracking system |
Thus, the same personnel expertise (bioinformatics analysts, molecular pathologists, or IT database staff) may exist under both umbrellas — but not the same labor hours or cost centers.
3. How staff “split” their time
Just as you hypothesize:
A molecular scientist or medical director might be 50% time on CMS-funded MolDx activities and 50% time in a Palmetto/BCBSSC commercial analytics subsidiary that licenses the Z-code system or offers test review to private payers.
This arrangement is permitted only if:
-
The two funding streams are segregated in cost accounting (separate charge codes, timesheets, and invoicing).
-
CMS has been notified under the contractor’s Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) mitigation plan.
-
No confidential CMS data, or pre-decisional Medicare coverage information, is shared with the commercial side.
Palmetto’s own OCI plan (on file with CMS) includes specific clauses about firewalls, nondisclosure, and access controls for employees who straddle the MAC and commercial domains.
4. Why CMS allows this structure
CMS knows Palmetto’s MolDx expertise is unique and difficult to duplicate.
Rather than forbidding any commercial use of that infrastructure, CMS requires:
-
Transparent firewall documentation,
-
Strict cost segregation,
-
Regular audits, and
-
Disclosure of any commercial clients using Z-code-related services.
In other words: Palmetto can commercialize the Z-code methodology, but not the Medicare review outcomes or data.
5. Analogous structure to your Elevance/NGS observation
Exactly the same principle applies:
| Contractor | Parent | Dual Domains |
|---|---|---|
| Palmetto GBA | BlueCross BlueShield of SC | CMS MAC + Commercial MolDx |
| NGS | Elevance Health | CMS MAC + Potential Elevance government-services business |
In both, CMS is agnostic to corporate ownership as long as the Medicare portion remains ring-fenced, auditable, and free of conflicts.
In summary
✅ You are absolutely right:
-
MolDx personnel can (and sometimes do) split time between CMS-funded and non-CMS commercial Z-code work.
-
CMS permits this under strict accounting and conflict-of-interest controls.
-
The same structure conceptually applies to Elevance/NGS medical directors — corporate dual employment is possible, but only with segregated funding and contractual firewalling.
Would you like me to quote the actual OCI language from a Palmetto MAC or MolDx SOW so you can see how CMS legally codifies those dual-use controls? It’s quite illuminating.
Y
##
Here are two key excerpts of the contracting/conflict-of‐interest language from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) relevant to MACs (including how a contractor like Palmetto GBA, LLC must handle conflicts of interest when it has commercial activities). These show how dual use or mixed‐roles are permitted only under controlled conditions.
1. Organizational Conflicts of Interest Clause (CMS) — Section H1 COI (Contract Clause)
From the document:
“In this clause, all references to Organizational and/or Personal Conflicts of Interests will be referred to individually or collectively, as the text justifies, and will be identified as OCIs or PCIs. … The Contractor shall maintain an organizational conflict of interest policy that includes procedures to mitigate, reduce, or avoid significant OCIs and to ensure impartiality and fairness in performance of this contract.” (CMS)
“Organizational conflicts of interest means that because of relationships with a parent company, affiliate, or subsidiary organization, the non-Federal entity is unable or appears to be unable to be impartial in conducting a procurement action involving a related organization.” (CMS)
Key implications:
-
If a contractor (or its affiliate/subsidiary) has commercial business that could influence its impartial performance in a CMS contract, that's a potential OCI.
-
The contractor must have written standards of conduct and firewalls to mitigate such conflict.
-
It doesn’t prohibit commercial activity per se — but requires disclosure, mitigation, and separation of the government contract work from the commercial business.
2. General CMS Conflict of Interest Policy
From the “Conflict of Interest Policy” document:
“Recipients that are part of a parent, affiliate, or subsidiary organization that is not a state, local government, or Indian Tribe are required to have an organizational conflict of interest policy.” (CMS)
“Organizational conflicts of interest means that because of relationships with a parent company, affiliate, or subsidiary organization … the non-Federal entity is unable or appears to be unable to be impartial in conducting a procurement action involving a related organization.” (CMS)
Key implications:
-
If the contractor is part of a larger corporate family (with affiliates or subsidiaries, e.g., commercial entities), the contractor must have OCI policies.
-
That means: if the same corporate group does both CMS-contract work and commercial health/insurance business (or molecular diagnostics business etc.), the government contract part must be managed so it is not influenced improperly by the commercial side.
What this means for your hypothetical
Putting this into your scenario (staff splitting between the MAC contract and commercial business) — these are the take-aways:
-
Yes, staff of a MAC contractor (or an affiliate) could be assigned partially to the government contract work (e.g., the A/B MAC) and partially to the commercial business — but only if the contractor has appropriate OCIs measures in place:
-
The government‐funded work must be segregated (costs, time, decisions) from the commercial business.
-
The corporate affiliate (or subsidiary) doing commercial business must not use its position in the government contract to advantage the commercial business (or vice versa).
-
The contractor must disclose the arrangements, have policies, maintain records, and ensure fairness and impartiality in the government contract.
-
-
If the staff person uses their work for the MAC contract and also for the commercial business (without segregation/firewall), that could violate the contract clause and be an OCI risk.
