Sunday, August 19, 2018

Feynman on What WHY Means

Feynman on what WHY means....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36GT2zI8lVA




For a comedian's take on the same question, here.

___

Speaker 1:                        If you get ahold of two magnets and you push them, you can feel this pushing between them. Turn it around the other way, and they slam together. Now, what is it, the feeling between those two magnets?
Richard Feynman:           What do you mean, what's the feeling between the two magnets when you hold them?
Speaker 1:                        Well, there's something there, isn't there? The sensation is that there's something there when you push these two magnets together.
Richard Feynman:           Listen to my question. What is the meaning when you say that there's a feeling? Of course, you feel it. Now, what do you want to know?
Speaker 1:                        What I want to know is what's going on between these two bits of metal.
Richard Feynman:           The magnets repel each other. The magnets repel each other.
Speaker 1:                        Well then, but what does that mean, or why are they doing that, or how are they doing it?
Richard Feynman:           You're asking-
Speaker 1:                         ... I think that's a perfectly reasonable question.
Richard Feynman:           Of course, it's a reasonable question. It's an excellent question, okay? But the problem that you're asking ... You see, when you ask why something happens, how does a person answer why something happens? 

For example, Aunt Mini is in the hospital. Why? Because she slipped. She went out and she slipped on the ice and broke her hip. That satisfies people. It satisfies, but it wouldn't satisfy someone who came from another planet and knew nothing about things. 

At first, you'd understand why, when you break your hip do you go to the hospital? How do you get to the hospital when the hip is broken? Well, because her husband, seeing that she had the hip was broken up, called the hospital up and sent somebody to get her. All that is understood by people.

                                           Now when you explain a why, you have to be in some framework that you allow something to be true, otherwise you're perpetually asking why. Why did the husband call up the hospital? Because husband is interested in his wife's welfare. Not always. Some husbands aren't interested in their wife's welfare when they're drunk and they're angry. 

And so you begin to get a very interesting understanding of the world and all its complications. If you try to follow anything up, you go deeper and deeper in various directions. 

For example, if you go "Why did she slip on the ice?" Well, ice is slippery. Everybody knows that. No problem. But you ask why is ice slippery? That's kind of curious. Ice is extremely slippery. It's very interesting. You say, "How does it work?" You see? So you could either say "I'm satisfied that you've answered me 'Ice is slippery, that explains it'" or you could go on and say "Why is ice slippery?" And then you're involved with something because there aren't many things as slippery as ice.

                                           It's very hard to get greasy stuff, but that's sort of wet and slimy. But a solid that's so slippery? Because it is in the case of ice, that when you're standing on it, they say, momentary the pressure melts the ice a little bit so you gotta sort of instantaneous water surface on which you're slipping. Why on ice and not on other things? Because water expands when it freezes so the pressure tries to undo the expansion and melts it, is capable of melting it. But other substances contract when they're freezing, and when you push them, they're just as satisfied to be solid. Why does water expand when it freezes and other substances don't expand when they freeze, all right? I'm not answering your question, but I'm telling you how difficult a "why" question is. 

You'll notice in this example that the more I ask why it gets interesting after a while. That's my idea, that the deeper a thing is the more interesting in it.

                                           We could even go further and say, "Why did she fall down when slipped?" That has to do with gravity, it involves in all the planets and everything else, but nevermind. It goes on and on. And when you ask for example, why two magnets repel, there are many different levels. It depends on whether you're a student of physics or an ordinary person that doesn't know anything or not. If you're somebody who doesn't know anything at all about it, all I can say is that there's a magnetic force that makes them repel and that you're feeling that force. You see, but that's very strange because I don't feel kind of force like that in other circumstances. When you turn them the other way, they attract.

                                           There's a very analogous force, electrical force, which is the same kind of a question. And you say "That's also very weird." But you're not at all disturbed by the fact that when you put your hand on the chair, it pushes you back. But we've found out by looking at it that that's the same force, as a matter of fact, the electrical force, not a magnetic exactly, in that case. But it's the same electric repulsions that are involved in keeping your finger away from the chair because everything's made out of it ... It's electrical forces in minor and microscope details. There's other forces involved, but it's connected to electrical forces. It turns out that the magnetic and the electric force, with which I wish to explain these things, this repulsion in the first place, is what ultimately is the deeper thing that we can start with to explain many other things that looked like everybody would just accept them.

                                           You know you can't put your hand through the chair. That's taken for granted, but that you can't put your hand through the chair, when looked at more closely, why, it involves these same repulsive forces that appear in magnets. The situation you then have to explain is why in magnets it goes over a bigger distance than in ordinarily, and there it has to do with the fact that in iron, all the electrons are spinning in the same direction. They all get lined up and they magnify the effect of the force until it's large enough at a distance that you can feel it.

                                           If you were a student, I could go further. I could tell you that the magnetic forces are related to the electrical forces very intimately, that our relationship between the gravity forces and electrical forces remains unknown, and so on. But I really can't do a good job, any job, of explaining magnetic force in terms of something else that you're more familiar with because I don't understand it in terms of anything else that you're more familiar with.

___

There are many books on "how to explain, explanation" but one different entry point than Feynman's is David Deutsch; see his famous Ted Talk or his more recent book "Beginning of Infinity."

Friday, August 17, 2018

Humor and The Human Drive to Problem-Solve


On Tuesday, August 14, 2018, I was in a Lyft and they were playing an interview with a book author at 9 pm on KALW, 91.7, SF local public radio.*  

It;s the broadcast and podcast series IN DEEP with Angie Coiro, and the author was Ken Jennings (Wiki here) and his new book, "Planet Funny."

He was talking about comedy, and he made an interesting point.  Most things we “like” have survival value.  We like food (biologically wired via taste, hunger), which has survival value.  We like sex (biologically wired via affection, sex drive) which has survival value.  

Why do we like humor?   Humor is seeing the incongruity between two things in a surprising way.  We like that.  But why would that evolve?  It may be an offshoot of problem solving.  To survive, human beings must solve all kinds of problems, see what’s there, what’s wrong, how to fix it, evaluate the difference.  So if we LIKE doing that, it has survival value.  Maybe this is why we like the logic, comparing, and cognitive surprises in humor.   He made a comment we are as much “homo ludens” or “homo ridens” (playing or laughing) as homo sapiens. 
 
(See also the book by Steven Johnson “Wonderland: How PlayMade the Modern World.”)