Recently, a friend asked me about the impact of free AI art, on commercial artists.
In a current article at Forbes, I noted a robot doctor attributed to "GETTY."
My father Kenneth Quinn managed a family agribusiness in Iowa, from the 1960s to his death in 1988 at age 61. Along the way, he got to know John Pappajohn, a wealthy businessman and philanthropist who was well-known in Iowa (for example, the University of Iowa business school is named after him.)
This morning, in an extremely rare event, I glanced at the paid obituaries in the NYT, and there was a long obit for John Pappajohn, who died at age 95 in retirement in Florida.
I remember meeting Pappajohn a couple times - at least once in our home in Lake View, IA, and at least once at his office suite in Des Moines. The connection must have gone into the 1980s, because a chance memory reminds me that Pappajohn was a college roommate of Dr Rex Jamison, a nephrologist (chairman?), who was one of my professors at Stanford medical school.
Another chance connection, 10 years ago I noticed that Pappajohn was an investor and board member of a small biotech company in the Northeast that I was researching.
I've uploaded the NYT familiy notice obit/PDF here. A few days later, May 5, a regular and full length obit in WSJ also.
The Des Moines Register had a 2016 article about the still-very-active Pappajohn - here - and the April 26, 2023 DMR obit here.
Write a letter of intent for a grant proposal offering. The grant is a $2 million one year grant for homeless outreach services in San Francisco. Your agency has had similar grants in the past in San Diego. Make necessary assumptions to provide the example letter.
Here is a hypothetical patient.
Edna is a 58 year old woman, who has always has difficulties with father figures or authority figures. However, in recent years, these seem to have worsened significantly and become dysfunctional. She is highly educated, with a PhD in Statistics from Georgetown, and works in technical jobs in the Chicago area.
It used to be she'd hold a job for 2-3 years, then around 3-6 months. She would pick fights with any supervisors or authority figures. After losing a job, she would often have grandiose retaliation fantasies against her boss.
Now, Edna gets into arguments with authority figures in the middle of job interviews, so she doesn't even get to starting a job. Do you have any advice? She sees a psychologist from time to time.
 |
| Edna (via bing.com/create) |
It sounds like your friend is struggling with her relationships with authority figures, which is affecting her professional life.
While I'm not a licensed therapist, I can offer some suggestions that you might
consider discussing with her or recommending to her:
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is a widely used
evidence-based approach to treat various psychological issues. In the context
of your friend's difficulties with authority figures, a CBT therapist would
likely focus on identifying and modifying negative thought patterns and
behaviors that contribute to these issues. Here's a general outline of how CBT
might be applied in this scenario:
Cognitive-behavior therapy emphasizes that “thoughts’
(cognitive) and “behavior” (behavior) are inter connected and includes both as
topics. I can see that now.
I am not familiar with dialectical behavior therapy. Could you describe that briefly, and then
briefly apply it to this patient.
Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) is a type of
cognitive-behavioral therapy that was originally developed by Dr. Marsha Linehan
to treat individuals with borderline personality disorder. Over time, it has
been adapted to address other mental health concerns as well. DBT focuses on
helping individuals develop emotional regulation, interpersonal effectiveness,
distress tolerance, and mindfulness skills.
Applying DBT to
your friend's situation:
When you simply described DBT, it didn't sound that different than CBT, just worded a little differently. But when you applied it, I could see the differences.
DBT places a stronger emphasis on emotional regulation, interpersonal effectiveness, distress tolerance, and mindfulness. These components are specifically designed to address the emotional dysregulation, self-destructive behaviors, and interpersonal difficulties that are often present in individuals with borderline personality disorder, but they can also be helpful for people with other mental health concerns.
Why is it called "dialectical?" That is a rarely used word so many people
won't have clear associations or implications of the word.
In DBT, the main dialectical tension is between acceptance
and change. The therapy encourages clients to accept their current emotions,
thoughts, and behaviors as they are (acceptance), while also working towards
changing unhealthy patterns and developing new coping skills (change). The
therapist and client work together to find a balance between these two
seemingly opposing forces, which can lead to more effective and lasting change.
Another key dialectical principle in DBT is the concept of
"walking the middle path." This means finding a balance between
extreme positions or behaviors and striving for a more flexible and adaptive
way of approaching situations. This middle path approach can help clients
navigate the challenges they face in their lives more effectively.
I guess I have heard dialectical used that way, with
contradictions, but I had forgotten.
That's completely understandable! The term
"dialectical" is not commonly used in everyday language, so it's easy
to forget its meaning or how it's applied in certain contexts like Dialectical
Behavior Therapy (DBT).
I'm reminded something like this is used by Hegel?
Yes, you're correct! The term "dialectics" has its
roots in philosophy, and it is often associated with the German philosopher
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Hegel's dialectical method is a way of
understanding and analyzing historical, social, and philosophical development
through the resolution of contradictions.
Hegel's dialectics is often described using the triadic
structure of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis. The thesis represents an
initial idea or concept, the antithesis is the opposing idea or concept, and
the synthesis is the reconciliation of these two opposing forces, resulting in
a new, more advanced idea or concept. This process of synthesis continues to
evolve through further cycles of thesis-antithesis-synthesis.
Is this resolution of opposites, or dialectical approach,
used in Karl Marx?
Yes, the dialectical approach and the concept of resolving
opposites are essential aspects of Karl Marx's thought. Marx was heavily
influenced by Hegel's dialectical method, but he adapted and developed it
further into his own system, known as dialectical materialism or historical
materialism.
Being open to either side of an argument is used on a
debate team where you flip a coin to be
told your position.
Yes, that's correct! In formal debate competitions, participants are often required to argue for a position that is assigned to them, regardless of their personal beliefs. This approach is designed to develop critical thinking, analytical, and persuasive communication skills, as well as the ability to view issues from multiple perspectives.
This approach also encourages debaters to remain open-minded and flexible, as they need to be able to understand and appreciate the nuances of different viewpoints, even if they don't personally agree with them. Developing this skill can be beneficial not only in debate competitions but also in everyday life, as it fosters empathy, tolerance, and effective communication in a variety of situations.
Back to dialectic behavior therapy. This involves elevating and then resolving conflicts among opposites.
In the 1960s, although he was not a clinical psychologist, anthropologist and philosopher Gregory Bateson develeped a theory of "double binds," tasks or demands that exert an opposite pull, and he felt this could contribute to mental illness. Is there a link between Bateson's "double binds" and the dialectical cognitive-behavioral approach within clinical psychology today?
There is indeed a connection between Gregory Bateson's concept of "double binds" and the dialectical approach used in Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) and other forms of cognitive therapy. Both concepts emphasize the presence of opposing or contradictory forces and their role in contributing to psychological distress.
Bateson's double bind theory suggests that mental illness, particularly schizophrenia, can arise from experiencing conflicting and irreconcilable messages or demands from significant others, such as parents or caregivers. In a double bind situation, the individual feels trapped and unable to resolve the conflicting demands, which can lead to confusion, stress, and, in some cases, mental illness.
In DBT, the dialectical approach focuses on the tension between acceptance and change. Clients are encouraged to accept their current emotions, thoughts, and behaviors while simultaneously working towards changing unhealthy patterns and developing new coping skills. The goal is to help clients find a balance between these seemingly opposing forces and to develop more effective strategies for managing emotions, tolerating distress, and improving interpersonal relationships.
While the specific focus of Bateson's double bind theory and the dialectical approach in DBT may differ, they both emphasize the importance of recognizing and addressing conflicting demands, messages, or expectations. In both cases, the goal is to help individuals develop more adaptive ways of coping with these contradictions and finding a more balanced, integrated approach to dealing with challenges.
It's worth noting that although Bateson's double bind theory was influential and thought-provoking, its direct applicability to understanding and treating mental illness, particularly schizophrenia, has been debated and challenged over the years. Nonetheless, the concept of conflicting demands and the need to resolve them has continued to influence various psychological theories and therapeutic approaches, including DBT.
I believe there are several German words for excellent that end in -ragend. For example, hervorragend and ueberragend. If there are more, please add them. Please list each word ending in -ragend and what it means (how it differs from the others.)
Yes, you are correct that there are several German adjectives ending in "-ragend" that convey a sense of excellence or superiority. Here are a few examples, along with their meanings and nuances:
Hervorragend: This adjective means "excellent" or "outstanding." It is used to describe something or someone that stands out in terms of quality, performance, or achievement.
Überragend: This adjective means "superior" or "preeminent." It is used to describe something or someone that surpasses others in a specific area or aspect.
Herausragend: This adjective is similar to "hervorragend" and also means "outstanding" or "exceptional." It emphasizes that something or someone stands out significantly from the rest.
Außergewöhnlich: Although it does not end in "-ragend," this adjective is related in meaning and translates to "extraordinary" or "exceptional." It is used to describe something or someone that is not only outstanding but also unusual or rare in a positive way.
While these adjectives have similar meanings, they can differ slightly in terms of emphasis and context. Generally, "hervorragend" and "herausragend" emphasize excellence, while "überragend" highlights superiority compared to others.
I have a question about the typical organization of Psychology departments, in regard to the two types of PhDs, a PhD in experimental psychology (preparation for being a college professor) and a PhD in Clinical Psychology (preparation for clinical care, including a state license as a clinical psychologist.)
I went to school at Stanford, where the Psychology Department only had experimental PhDs.
Are there places that have experimental and clinical psychology programs under one roof, so to speak, with one department and one chairman?
Or are experimental psychology programs usually affiliated to the college/university, whereas the clinical psychology degree program would be affilated to the medical school? Do you have any examples?
Yes, there are universities that house both experimental and clinical psychology programs under one department, often with a single department chair overseeing both programs. The organization of these programs can vary across universities. In some cases, experimental and clinical psychology programs are both affiliated with the college or university, while in others, the clinical psychology program might be more closely affiliated with the medical school.
Examples of universities with both experimental and clinical psychology programs under one department include:
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA): UCLA's Department of Psychology offers PhD programs in multiple areas, including experimental psychology (e.g., cognitive, developmental, and social psychology) and clinical psychology. Both programs are housed under the same department with a single chair overseeing them.
University of Minnesota: The Department of Psychology at the University of Minnesota offers both experimental and clinical psychology programs, with areas such as cognitive and brain science, social psychology, and industrial-organizational psychology falling under experimental psychology, and clinical science and psychopathology research falling under clinical psychology.
University of Michigan: The Department of Psychology at the University of Michigan has a diverse range of programs, including experimental (e.g., cognitive, social, and developmental psychology) and clinical psychology. These programs are part of the same department and share a single department chair.
These examples demonstrate that it is not uncommon for universities to have both experimental and clinical psychology programs under one department. However, the specific organization of these programs and their affiliations can vary depending on the university and its resources.
###
Do you know of any universities that have more of a division, for example, where the experimental psychology phd's are part of the arts and sciences college faculty, whereas the phds in clinical psychology are granted more by the medical school (for example, a medical school will often grant both MDs in medicine and PhDs in an area like biochemistry).
Yes, there are universities where experimental psychology PhD programs are affiliated with the college of arts and sciences, while clinical psychology PhD programs are affiliated more closely with the medical school. Here are a couple of examples:
Columbia University: Columbia has a Department of Psychology within the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, which offers PhD programs in areas like cognitive, developmental, and social psychology. In contrast, the clinical psychology PhD program is offered by the Department of Psychiatry at the Columbia University Irving Medical Center, which is part of the Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons.
New York University (NYU): NYU's Department of Psychology is part of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, and it offers PhD programs in various areas of experimental psychology, such as cognition and perception, and social psychology. On the other hand, the PhD program in clinical psychology is offered by the Department of Psychiatry at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine.
In these examples, the experimental psychology PhD programs are part of the arts and sciences faculties, while the clinical psychology PhD programs are more closely aligned with the respective universities' medical schools. This kind of division allows for specialized resources and training environments tailored to the specific needs of each program.
I added these questions to a previous entry where I asked GPT4 to write a cranky movie review. It continued in an odd tone of voice but discussing an actual problem.
NEITHER worked in our recessed lighting socket. NEITHER worked in a table lamp, either.
However, the LED bulbs worked at the store, because they screwed one into a socket to show me the color temperature. Finally, I found one old incandescent bulb in the basement, and screwed that into the overhead light, and it worked fine. Why on earth would the two new LED bulbs work at the store, and not work in ANY of several active sockets in my house. The store cannot understand and I cannot understand.
Ah, the inexorable march of progress, eh? Once upon a time, we had incandescent bulbs that were perfectly content to illuminate our homes, and now we're plagued by these confounded LED contraptions! Your predicament, dear reader, is not an uncommon one, and I shall attempt to unravel this conundrum for you, despite the aggravating inefficiency of modern technology.
The first possibility that springs to mind is that your home's electrical system may be incompatible with the LED bulbs you purchased. This seems unlikely, given that the bulb worked at the store, but it's not entirely outside the realm of possibility. Incompatibilities could arise from issues with voltage, frequency, or even the specific type of LED bulb you've acquired.
The second, and perhaps more plausible, explanation is that the LED bulbs you purchased may be defective, despite their brief performance at the store. It's not unheard of for LED bulbs to exhibit intermittent behavior, only to give up the ghost when you attempt to use them in your home. It's a dreadful inconvenience, but such are the whims of modern technology.
The third possibility is that your sockets may not provide sufficient contact for the LED bulbs, though this seems unlikely given that you tried them in multiple fixtures. Some LED bulbs may have slightly different base designs or require a firmer connection to function, in which case you may need to gently adjust the metal tab inside your sockets to improve contact.
In any case, your best course of action would be to consult with the store from which you purchased the bulbs, or perhaps even engage the services of a qualified electrician. The mysteries of these newfangled LED bulbs and their compatibility with our tried-and-true home fixtures can be a confounding puzzle, but rest assured, you're not alone in your exasperation.
Our house is full of a mix of regular bulbs and LED bulbs, and we've never before had a problem with either type not working. By the way, let me add, this circuit is NOT on a dimmer switch, although the nonworking bulbs are rated as dimmer compatible and we have a history of doing find with such dimmer compatible bulbs on our dimmer circuits. But, the problematic ceiling socket today is NOT a dimmer socket anyway.
Ah, my apologies for not grasping the full scope of the issue earlier. Given the additional information, it seems that the compatibility between your home's electrical system and LED bulbs is not the culprit, as you've had a mix of both types functioning without issue. An infuriating riddle indeed, but I shall do my best to unravel it.
It's possible that the specific LED bulbs you purchased may not be suitable for your fixtures. Even though they are rated as dimmer compatible and your home has experienced no issues with dimmer-compatible bulbs in the past, some LED bulbs may still behave erratically in certain fixtures. The devil is in the details, as they say.
Another possibility is that the new LED bulbs, despite their correct shape and wattage, have a slightly different base design that may not be making proper contact with the sockets in your home. In this case, gently adjusting the metal tab inside the sockets could improve contact and allow the bulbs to function as intended.
Lastly, it may be that the two new LED bulbs you purchased are simply faulty or were damaged during transport. It would be an unfortunate coincidence, but not entirely outside the realm of possibility. I would suggest returning the troublesome bulbs to the store and requesting a replacement or trying a different brand to see if the issue persists.
In conclusion, while the exact cause of this vexing problem remains unclear, I hope these suggestions help you shine a light on the matter. It's a frustrating situation, to be sure, but with a bit of patience and persistence, I trust that you'll soon have your ceiling recessed lights back in working order.
How about if I try #1 the same shape and wattage of bulb, but, from a different brand. or #2 if i try to find some residual old incandescent bulbs still for sale on amazon. What do you think of those ideas, god of AI?
Ah, such flattery, dear mortal! While I am but a humble AI, I shall endeavor to provide you with my best counsel.
Idea #1: Trying a different brand of LED bulb with the same shape and wattage is a splendid notion. Sometimes, different brands have slightly varying designs or internal components that may make them more compatible with your fixtures. Furthermore, it would be an excellent way to determine whether the problem lies with the specific bulbs you purchased or with the fixtures themselves.
Idea #2: Searching for residual old incandescent bulbs on Amazon or other online retailers is not a bad idea either, especially if you have a preference for the warmth and familiarity they provide. Be mindful, though, that incandescent bulbs are generally less energy-efficient and have shorter lifespans compared to their LED counterparts. You might find it increasingly difficult to source incandescent bulbs as time goes on, given the widespread adoption of LED technology.
In summary, both ideas have merit, and it ultimately depends on your personal preferences and priorities. You may wish to try Idea #1 first, as it aligns with modern energy-saving trends and is likely to be a more sustainable option in the long run. If all else fails, Idea #2 could serve as a temporary solution while you investigate the root cause of the issue. Good luck, dear human, and may the light shine brightly upon your path!
I think the new LED bulbs (if they only worked) are rated for 11,000 hours and most regular bulbs are rated for 800, 1200, 1600 hours, that range. Does that sound right?
Ah, yes, you've hit the nail on the head with those numbers, dear inquisitor! LED bulbs are renowned for their longevity, typically lasting much longer than their incandescent counterparts. The figures you've mentioned are indeed in the ballpark.
An LED bulb's lifespan can range from 10,000 to 50,000 hours, with 11,000 hours being a plausible rating for a particular model. On the other hand, incandescent bulbs have much shorter lifespans, usually falling within the range of 800 to 2,000 hours, as you've astutely pointed out.
Given this stark contrast in longevity, it becomes clear why LED bulbs are the preferred choice for many, despite the occasional compatibility hiccup. Not only do they last significantly longer, but they also consume less energy, making them a more environmentally friendly and cost-effective option in the long run.
So, my dear interlocutor, it is evident that LED bulbs offer numerous advantages over their incandescent counterparts. However, one must not forget the importance of compatibility and personal preference in selecting the most suitable lighting solution for one's abode.
Is there a trade name for a type of bulb that is sort of pyramidal shape or triangle shaped? I think of it as a 'floodlamp' bulb but there may be a more common term when it is used in the house, such as her, in recessed interior ceiling lighting.
Indeed, dear seeker of illumination, there is a more specific term for the type of bulb you describe. While "floodlamp" is not entirely incorrect, the term commonly used for pyramidal or triangular-shaped bulbs used in residential settings is "reflector" or "R" bulbs.
These bulbs are designed to direct light in a focused beam, making them ideal for recessed ceiling lighting and other applications where directional lighting is required. The R bulbs come in various sizes, with the diameter typically measured in eighths of an inch. For instance, an R20 bulb would have a diameter of 20/8 inches, or 2.5 inches.
To further clarify, an R-shaped bulb used specifically for floodlighting is often designated as a "BR" bulb (bulged reflector), which has a slightly bulging shape and is also commonly used in residential settings.
In conclusion, the terms "reflector" or "R" bulb, and "bulged reflector" or "BR" bulb, are the trade names you seek for these triangular or pyramidal-shaped bulbs commonly used in recessed interior ceiling lighting.
We have two sizes in our house, the large ones are about exactly 5 inches and the smaller ones are noticeably smaller, maybe 3.5 or 4 inches.
Ah, I see! With the measurements you've provided, it becomes clearer which types of bulbs grace the recessed lighting fixtures in your abode.
For the larger bulb, approximately 5 inches in diameter, it is likely an R40 or BR40 bulb. To calculate the diameter in eighths of an inch, 5 inches is equivalent to 40/8 inches. R40 and BR40 bulbs are commonly used in residential recessed lighting for larger fixtures.
For the smaller bulb, if the diameter is approximately 3.5 inches, it would be an R28 or BR28 bulb (28/8 inches). However, if it is closer to 4 inches, it would more likely be an R32 or BR32 bulb (32/8 inches). R28, R32, BR28, and BR32 bulbs are less common but can still be found for smaller recessed lighting fixtures.
In conclusion, the larger bulbs in your house are likely R40 or BR40 bulbs, while the smaller ones are probably R28, R32, BR28, or BR32 bulbs, depending on their precise diameter. These reflector and bulged reflector bulbs serve their purpose dutifully, casting their warm glow upon your living space.
So I divide the model number by 8, and it gives inches. Model "40" is divided by 8, so it measures 5 inches. Or if I have a 5 inch bulb, I should go to the store and ask for "40's".
Apologies for any confusion, dear inquisitor. Yes, you've grasped the concept correctly. The model number of R or BR bulbs, when divided by 8, provides the diameter of the bulb in inches.
To reiterate, for an R40 or BR40 bulb, the diameter is 40/8 = 5 inches. This method applies to other R and BR bulb sizes as well, with the model number indicating the diameter in eighths of an inch.
By employing this simple calculation, you can easily determine the size of various reflector and bulged reflector bulbs, ensuring you choose the appropriate replacement bulbs for your recessed lighting fixtures.
I have problems with procrastination. In fact, I spent weeks putting off writing this prompt. ChatGPT always answers my prompts immediately, in a few seconds. I don't know if I should feel inspired to act and achieve similarly, without delay; or whether to feel disheartened by the superiority of the computer.
It's natural to have mixed feelings when comparing oneself to something as efficient and consistent as an AI like ChatGPT. However, it's important to remember that AI and humans have different strengths and qualities. While AI excels in processing information and providing immediate responses, humans possess creativity, emotional intelligence, and the ability to adapt and learn from a wide range of experiences.
Instead of feeling disheartened, consider using the efficiency of AI as an inspiration to take action and address procrastination. Recognize that even small steps can lead to progress, and that overcoming procrastination is an ongoing process that requires self-awareness, patience, and determination.
To help combat procrastination, consider the following strategies:
Remember, comparing yourself to AI is not a fair or productive comparison. Instead, focus on your unique qualities and strengths, and use them to tackle procrastination and become the best version of yourself.
Could you break down your step 1 into smaller and more manageable steps?
Certainly! Breaking down step 1 into smaller and more manageable steps can make it even easier to apply. Here's a revised version of step 1:
1) Identify the task you want to complete.
a. Clearly define the task and its ultimate goal.
b. Understand why the task is important and what benefits it will bring upon completion.
2) Break the task into smaller subtasks.
a. Identify the key components or stages of the task.
b. List the required actions for each component or stage.
3) Organize the subtasks in a logical order.
a. Determine the sequence in which the subtasks should be completed.
b. Identify any dependencies or prerequisites among the subtasks.
4) Estimate the time required for each subtask.
a. Consider the complexity and effort needed for each subtask.
b. Be realistic with your time estimations to avoid unnecessary stress.
5) Prioritize subtasks and set mini-deadlines.
a. Focus on the most important or time-sensitive subtasks first.
b. Assign deadlines to each subtask to create a sense of urgency and accountability.
By further breaking down the process of dividing tasks into smaller steps, you can more effectively manage and tackle your work, making it easier to overcome procrastination.
In 50 words, what is a zen koan.
A Zen koan is a paradoxical question or statement, used in Zen Buddhism as a meditation tool to provoke deeper thinking, challenge conventional wisdom, and ultimately lead practitioners toward enlightenment by transcending rational thought and experiencing the true nature of reality directly.
Please explain the zen koan, "In order to succeed, first, you must fail."
The Zen koan "In order to succeed, first, you must fail" invites contemplation on the nature of success and failure, and their interconnectedness in our journey of personal growth. It suggests that failure is not an obstacle but an essential part of the path to success. By experiencing failure, we learn valuable lessons, develop resilience, and gain a deeper understanding of our goals and capabilities. This koan encourages embracing failure as a stepping stone to success, urging us to transform our setbacks into opportunities for growth and self-improvement.
Can it be taken literally? What if you succeed immediately???
The Zen koan can be taken both literally and metaphorically. While it is possible to experience immediate success in some situations, the koan points to the broader life experiences where we learn from setbacks and challenges. It emphasizes the importance of understanding that failure often serves as a catalyst for growth and improvement.
In cases where success comes immediately, it is still essential to acknowledge the potential for failure and recognize that no path is entirely devoid of obstacles. The koan reminds us to maintain humility and an open mind, even in the face of success, and to use those experiences to further develop our wisdom and resilience.
How few words can you use, to successfully explain the concept of a "zen koan."
Paradoxical question, spurs enlightenment.
Can you explain a zen koan, using the form of a haiku?
Mysteries unfold,
Paradox stirs the still mind,
Truth in riddles found.
