Here is a hypothetical patient.
Edna is a 58 year old woman, who has always has
difficulties with father figures or authority figures. However, in recent years, these seem to have
worsened significantly and become dysfunctional. She is highly educated, with a PhD in Statistics
from Georgetown, and works in technical jobs in the Chicago area.
It used to be she'd hold a job for 2-3 years, then around
3-6 months. She would pick fights with
any supervisors or authority figures. After
losing a job, she would often have grandiose retaliation fantasies against her
boss.
Now, Edna gets into arguments with authority figures in
the middle of job interviews, so she doesn't even get to starting a job. Do you have any advice? She sees a psychologist from time to time.
 |
| Edna (via bing.com/create) |
It sounds like your friend is struggling with her relationships with authority figures, which is affecting her professional life.
While I'm not a licensed therapist, I can offer some suggestions that you might
consider discussing with her or recommending to her:
Encourage regular therapy: Suggest that she sees a
psychologist or therapist regularly, rather than just from time to time.
Consistent therapy can help address the root cause of her issues with authority
figures, and develop coping strategies.
Explore different therapy modalities: There are many
types of therapy available, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT),
dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), and psychodynamic therapy. Encourage your
friend to explore different options to see which approach resonates with her
the most.
Develop self-awareness: Encourage your friend to
reflect on his emotions and reactions towards authority figures. Understanding
the underlying reasons for her behavior can help her better manage her feelings
and actions.
Seek support: Recommend that your friend join a
support group or find a mentor with whom she can discuss his challenges.
Connecting with others who have similar experiences can provide valuable
insights and encouragement.
Develop conflict resolution skills: Encourage your
friend to learn about and practice effective communication and conflict
resolution techniques. This can help her navigate disagreements with authority
figures more constructively.
Practice mindfulness and stress reduction techniques:
Mindfulness practices, such as meditation or deep breathing exercises, can help
your friend manage his emotions and reactions in the moment, making it less
likely for her to engage in confrontational behavior.
Focus on personal growth: Your friend may benefit from
focusing on her personal development, including setting goals, building
resilience, and cultivating a growth mindset. This could potentially help her
view challenging situations as opportunities for growth and learning.
It's important to remember that your friend will need to be
open to seeking help and making changes in her life. Ultimately, it's up to her
to take the necessary steps towards improvement. Be patient and supportive, and
remind her that addressing these issues is a process that takes time and
effort.
Could you give me a bit of a picture of what CBT would be
like in this scenario? I can't really
picture it.
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is a widely used
evidence-based approach to treat various psychological issues. In the context
of your friend's difficulties with authority figures, a CBT therapist would
likely focus on identifying and modifying negative thought patterns and
behaviors that contribute to these issues. Here's a general outline of how CBT
might be applied in this scenario:
Establishing a therapeutic relationship: The
therapist would start by building rapport and trust with your friend, creating
a safe and supportive environment for her to discuss his issues with authority
figures.
Identifying problematic thoughts and behaviors: The
therapist would work with your friend to identify specific negative thought
patterns and behaviors that arise when interacting with authority figures.
Examples might include thoughts like "This person is trying to control
me" or behaviors like arguing and confrontation.
Challenging negative thoughts: CBT focuses on the
idea that our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are interconnected. The
therapist would help your friend examine and challenge the accuracy of his
negative thoughts, teaching him to replace them with more balanced and
realistic perspectives.
Developing coping strategies: The therapist would
work with your friend to develop and practice healthier ways of responding to
authority figures. This might include assertive communication skills,
relaxation techniques, or cognitive restructuring exercises to help him manage
his emotions and reactions more effectively.
Role-playing and rehearsal: The therapist may use
role-playing exercises to help your friend practice new skills and strategies
in a safe and controlled environment. This can build confidence and better
prepare him for real-life situations.
Homework and self-monitoring: Your friend would
likely be given homework assignments to practice the skills and strategies
discussed in therapy sessions. This might include journaling her thoughts and
feelings, tracking his progress, and identifying any triggers or challenges
that arise.
Evaluating progress and adjusting treatment:
Throughout the course of therapy, the therapist would regularly evaluate your
friend's progress and adjust the treatment plan as needed. The goal is to help
your friend develop the skills and strategies necessary to effectively manage her
interactions with authority figures in a healthier way.
Remember that the specific approach and techniques used in
CBT can vary depending on the individual and the therapist. It's essential for
your friend to find a therapist she feels comfortable with, who can tailor the
therapy to best address her unique needs and challenges.
Cognitive-behavior therapy emphasizes that “thoughts’
(cognitive) and “behavior” (behavior) are inter connected and includes both as
topics. I can see that now.
Yes, that's correct! Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is
based on the idea that our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are
interconnected. The main goal of CBT is to help individuals identify and change
negative or distorted thought patterns, which in turn can lead to improvements
in their emotional state and behavior.
In CBT, therapists work with clients to examine their
thoughts and beliefs, helping them recognize any irrational or negative
thought patterns that may be contributing to emotional distress or problematic
behavior. By learning to challenge and reframe these thoughts, clients
can develop more balanced and realistic perspectives, which can lead to
positive changes in their feelings and actions.
At the same time, CBT also focuses on helping clients modify
unhelpful or maladaptive behaviors. Therapists work with clients to
develop healthier coping strategies, problem-solving skills, and communication
techniques. This can empower individuals to manage their emotions and reactions
more effectively, leading to improved well-being and functioning in various
aspects of their lives.
Overall, CBT emphasizes the importance of both cognitive and
behavioral aspects in addressing psychological issues, and it has been proven
to be an effective treatment for a wide range of mental health disorders and
concerns.
I am not familiar with dialectical behavior therapy. Could you describe that briefly, and then
briefly apply it to this patient.
Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) is a type of
cognitive-behavioral therapy that was originally developed by Dr. Marsha Linehan
to treat individuals with borderline personality disorder. Over time, it has
been adapted to address other mental health concerns as well. DBT focuses on
helping individuals develop emotional regulation, interpersonal effectiveness,
distress tolerance, and mindfulness skills.
Here's a brief description of the main components of DBT:
Emotional regulation: DBT helps individuals identify,
understand, and manage their emotions in a healthier way, reducing emotional
vulnerability and improving emotional stability.
Interpersonal effectiveness: DBT teaches clients
effective communication and relationship-building skills, helping them navigate
interpersonal situations more assertively and confidently.
Distress tolerance: DBT helps individuals develop
strategies for tolerating and coping with stressful situations or crises,
reducing impulsive and self-destructive behaviors.
Mindfulness: DBT incorporates mindfulness practices,
encouraging clients to be present and nonjudgmental in the moment, improving
their self-awareness and ability to regulate emotions.
Applying DBT to
your friend's situation:
Emotional regulation: Your friend could learn techniques to
better identify and manage her emotional reactions when dealing with authority
figures, leading to a more balanced response.
Interpersonal effectiveness: DBT could help your
friend develop assertive communication skills, allowing her to express his
needs and opinions in a respectful manner when interacting with authority
figures, without becoming confrontational.
Distress tolerance: Your friend could learn
strategies to tolerate the discomfort of interacting with authority figures,
instead of resorting to argumentative behavior.
Mindfulness: Practicing mindfulness could help your
friend become more aware of her thoughts, emotions, and reactions in the moment
when dealing with authority figures, providing an opportunity to choose
healthier responses.
It's important to note that the specific techniques and
strategies used in DBT can vary depending on the individual and the therapist.
If your friend is interested in DBT, it's essential for him to find a therapist
trained in this modality who can tailor the therapy to best address his unique
needs and challenges.
When you simply described DBT, it didn't sound that
different than CBT, just worded a little differently. But when you applied it, I could see the
differences.
I'm glad that applying DBT to your friend's situation helped
clarify the differences between CBT and DBT. While both are rooted in
cognitive-behavioral principles, DBT has some unique features that set it apart
from traditional CBT.
DBT places a stronger emphasis on emotional regulation,
interpersonal effectiveness, distress tolerance, and mindfulness. These
components are specifically designed to address the emotional dysregulation,
self-destructive behaviors, and interpersonal difficulties that are often
present in individuals with borderline personality disorder, but they can also
be helpful for people with other mental health concerns.
In addition to the unique skill-building components, another
key difference between CBT and DBT is the format in which they are typically
delivered. DBT usually consists of individual therapy sessions, group skills
training sessions, and phone coaching with a therapist as needed. This
comprehensive approach helps clients reinforce the skills they learn in therapy
and apply them more effectively to real-life situations.
Overall, while CBT and DBT share some similarities, they
have distinct features and therapeutic approaches. It's essential for
individuals to find the therapy that best suits their needs and preferences,
and it may involve exploring different modalities or even combining elements
from various therapeutic approaches.
Why is it called "dialectical?" That is a rarely used word so many people
won't have clear associations or implications of the word.
The term "dialectical" in Dialectical Behavior
Therapy (DBT) refers to the process of synthesizing seemingly opposing ideas or
concepts to find a balanced middle ground. The word "dialectics" has
its roots in philosophy and refers to a method of reasoning through dialogue
and discussion to resolve contradictions or disagreements. In the context of
DBT, dialectics helps clients find a balance between acceptance and change.
In DBT, the main dialectical tension is between acceptance
and change. The therapy encourages clients to accept their current emotions,
thoughts, and behaviors as they are (acceptance), while also working towards
changing unhealthy patterns and developing new coping skills (change). The
therapist and client work together to find a balance between these two
seemingly opposing forces, which can lead to more effective and lasting change.
Another key dialectical principle in DBT is the concept of
"walking the middle path." This means finding a balance between
extreme positions or behaviors and striving for a more flexible and adaptive
way of approaching situations. This middle path approach can help clients
navigate the challenges they face in their lives more effectively.
In summary, the term "dialectical" in DBT refers
to the process of balancing and reconciling seemingly opposing ideas or
concepts, with a particular focus on finding a balance between acceptance and
change. This approach helps clients develop more effective coping strategies
and improve their emotional regulation, interpersonal effectiveness, distress
tolerance, and mindfulness skills.
I guess I have heard dialectical used that way, with
contradictions, but I had forgotten.
That's completely understandable! The term
"dialectical" is not commonly used in everyday language, so it's easy
to forget its meaning or how it's applied in certain contexts like Dialectical
Behavior Therapy (DBT).
To reiterate, in DBT, the term "dialectical"
refers to the process of synthesizing and reconciling seemingly opposing ideas
or concepts, such as acceptance and change, to find a balanced middle ground.
The dialectical approach helps clients navigate and resolve contradictions or
disagreements in their thoughts, emotions, and behaviors, ultimately leading to
more effective coping strategies and improved well-being.
If you have any more questions or need further
clarification, please don't hesitate to ask!
I'm reminded something like this is used by Hegel?
Yes, you're correct! The term "dialectics" has its
roots in philosophy, and it is often associated with the German philosopher
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Hegel's dialectical method is a way of
understanding and analyzing historical, social, and philosophical development
through the resolution of contradictions.
Hegel's dialectics is often described using the triadic
structure of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis. The thesis represents an
initial idea or concept, the antithesis is the opposing idea or concept, and
the synthesis is the reconciliation of these two opposing forces, resulting in
a new, more advanced idea or concept. This process of synthesis continues to
evolve through further cycles of thesis-antithesis-synthesis.
In the context of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), the
dialectical approach also focuses on the synthesis of opposing forces, such as
acceptance and change. While Hegel's dialectics and the dialectical approach
used in DBT are not identical, they both involve the reconciliation of
seemingly opposing ideas or concepts to reach a more balanced and integrated
understanding or solution.
It's important to note that the concept of dialectics
predates Hegel, with its origins in ancient Greek philosophy. The Greek
philosopher Heraclitus, for example, believed that the world was in a constant
state of change driven by the tension and resolution of opposites. However,
Hegel's work has been particularly influential in shaping modern
interpretations of dialectics and its application in various fields, including
psychology and therapy.
Is this resolution of opposites, or dialectical approach,
used in Karl Marx?
Yes, the dialectical approach and the concept of resolving
opposites are essential aspects of Karl Marx's thought. Marx was heavily
influenced by Hegel's dialectical method, but he adapted and developed it
further into his own system, known as dialectical materialism or historical
materialism.
In contrast to Hegel's idealist approach, which emphasized
the importance of ideas in shaping history, Marx's dialectical materialism
focused on the material conditions of society, such as economic systems and
social relations. For Marx, historical development and societal change were
driven primarily by the tensions and contradictions within these material
conditions.
A central concept in Marx's dialectical materialism is the
class struggle, which arises from the contradictions and conflicts between
different social classes with opposing interests. According to Marx, the class
struggle is the driving force behind historical development and societal
change.
For example, in the context of capitalism, Marx identified a
fundamental contradiction between the bourgeoisie (capitalist class) and the
proletariat (working class). The bourgeoisie owns the means of production and
exploits the labor of the proletariat, leading to a conflict of interests. Marx
believed that this class struggle would eventually result in the overthrow of
capitalism and the establishment of a classless, communist society.
In summary, the dialectical approach and the resolution of
opposites play a crucial role in Karl Marx's thought, particularly in his
analysis of historical development and societal change. Marx adapted Hegel's
dialectics and applied it to the material conditions of society, focusing on
the class struggle as the driving force behind history.
I think sometimes people feign to use a dialectical
approach, resolving opposites, but it is by setting up a flimsy opposing
premise, or 'straw man' and then taking it down. This gives the appearance of a two-sided
argument, but it isn't really.
You're absolutely right. The situation you're describing is
known as a "straw man" argument or fallacy. It occurs when someone
creates a misrepresentation, weak version, or oversimplification of an opposing
argument, and then proceeds to refute it, giving the illusion of having
effectively countered the actual argument. This tactic can be misleading and
intellectually dishonest, as it does not engage with the genuine opposing
viewpoint or address its complexities.
In a true dialectical approach, the goal is to genuinely
consider and engage with opposing ideas or concepts, seeking to resolve
contradictions and reach a more balanced and nuanced understanding. This
process should involve critical thinking, open-mindedness, and a willingness to
revise one's own position when faced with compelling evidence or reasoning.
Using a straw man argument to feign a dialectical approach
is not only an unfair debating tactic but also hinders the potential for
genuine intellectual growth and progress that can be achieved through honest
dialectical engagement. It's essential to recognize and avoid straw man
fallacies in discussions and debates to foster a more constructive and
authentic exchange of ideas.
Being open to either side of an argument is used on a
debate team where you flip a coin to be
told your position.
Yes, that's correct! In formal debate competitions,
participants are often required to argue for a position that is assigned to
them, regardless of their personal beliefs. This approach is designed to
develop critical thinking, analytical, and persuasive communication skills, as
well as the ability to view issues from multiple perspectives.
Debate teams often practice by assigning members to argue
both for and against a given topic or proposition. This process can involve
flipping a coin or using another random method to determine which side of the
argument they will be supporting. By engaging in this exercise, debaters learn
to construct well-reasoned arguments, anticipate potential counterarguments,
and develop a deeper understanding of the complexities of the issue at hand.
This approach also encourages debaters to remain open-minded
and flexible, as they need to be able to understand and appreciate the nuances
of different viewpoints, even if they don't personally agree with them.
Developing this skill can be beneficial not only in debate competitions but
also in everyday life, as it fosters empathy, tolerance, and effective
communication in a variety of situations.
Back to dialectic behavior therapy. This involves elevating and then resolving conflicts among opposites.
In the 1960s, although he was not a clinical psychologist, anthropologist and philosopher Gregory Bateson develeped a theory of "double binds," tasks or demands that exert an opposite pull, and he felt this could contribute to mental illness. Is there a link between Bateson's "double binds" and the dialectical cognitive-behavioral approach within clinical psychology today?
There is indeed a connection between Gregory Bateson's concept of "double binds" and the dialectical approach used in Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) and other forms of cognitive therapy. Both concepts emphasize the presence of opposing or contradictory forces and their role in contributing to psychological distress.
Bateson's double bind theory suggests that mental illness, particularly schizophrenia, can arise from experiencing conflicting and irreconcilable messages or demands from significant others, such as parents or caregivers. In a double bind situation, the individual feels trapped and unable to resolve the conflicting demands, which can lead to confusion, stress, and, in some cases, mental illness.
In DBT, the dialectical approach focuses on the tension between acceptance and change. Clients are encouraged to accept their current emotions, thoughts, and behaviors while simultaneously working towards changing unhealthy patterns and developing new coping skills. The goal is to help clients find a balance between these seemingly opposing forces and to develop more effective strategies for managing emotions, tolerating distress, and improving interpersonal relationships.
While the specific focus of Bateson's double bind theory and the dialectical approach in DBT may differ, they both emphasize the importance of recognizing and addressing conflicting demands, messages, or expectations. In both cases, the goal is to help individuals develop more adaptive ways of coping with these contradictions and finding a more balanced, integrated approach to dealing with challenges.
It's worth noting that although Bateson's double bind theory was influential and thought-provoking, its direct applicability to understanding and treating mental illness, particularly schizophrenia, has been debated and challenged over the years. Nonetheless, the concept of conflicting demands and the need to resolve them has continued to influence various psychological theories and therapeutic approaches, including DBT.
