Discuss the remarkable and subtle series, Better Call Saul.
##
Better Call Saul is a remarkable and meticulously crafted series that serves as both a prequel and a character study, exploring the transformation of Jimmy McGill into the sleazy yet strangely charismatic Saul Goodman. Created by Vince Gilligan and Peter Gould, the show defies conventional prequel pitfalls by standing as an exceptional work in its own right, with intricate storytelling, stunning cinematography, and some of the best character development in modern television.
One of the most fascinating aspects of the series is its subtlety. Unlike Breaking Bad, which often leaned into high-stakes action and explosive moments, Better Call Saul thrives in the quiet, slow-burning tension of ethical dilemmas, legal maneuvering, and psychological unraveling. Every small decision, whether it’s a forged document or a whispered manipulation, carries immense weight. The show demands patience, rewarding viewers with rich layers of foreshadowing and thematic depth.
The characterization is unparalleled, particularly in how it deepens and recontextualizes figures from Breaking Bad. Jimmy McGill (Bob Odenkirk) is no mere caricature of a sleazy lawyer; he is a man shaped by rejection, insecurity, and a deep-seated need to prove himself. His tragic arc is as much about self-destruction as it is about the corrupting power of ambition. Kim Wexler (Rhea Seehorn) is perhaps the show's greatest triumph—far more than just a love interest, she is an enigma, capable of both unwavering integrity and reckless risk-taking, mirroring Jimmy in unexpected ways. Meanwhile, the show’s treatment of Mike Ehrmantraut (Jonathan Banks) and Gus Fring (Giancarlo Esposito) adds tragic dimensions to their otherwise stoic personas, showing how pragmatism and moral compromise chip away at a person’s soul.
The visual storytelling is another standout feature. Director Michael Slovis and the cinematography team craft a world where every frame is meticulously composed, whether through stark, shadowy noir lighting or stunning desert vistas. The show’s deliberate pacing allows for rich visual metaphors—Jimmy’s yellow and orange shirts gradually darkening into the gaudy Saul Goodman palette, or the symbolic use of office spaces to reflect power and aspiration.
Perhaps what makes Better Call Saul most remarkable is how it challenges the audience’s moral compass. Unlike Breaking Bad, where Walter White’s descent into villainy is clear, Jimmy’s transformation is more insidious. He’s likable, often funny, and sometimes entirely justified in his grievances—so when he crosses ethical lines, the audience often finds themselves complicit, rationalizing his behavior until the full consequences become undeniable.
By the time the series concludes, it’s clear that Better Call Saul isn’t just a companion piece to Breaking Bad—it’s an introspective tragedy about the nature of identity, the choices that define us, and the slow erosion of integrity. Its ending is both deeply satisfying and haunting, proving that few shows manage to be as intellectually rich, emotionally resonant, and narratively bold.
##
It is remarkable how it functions both as a very detailed prequel, it also jumps over the story arc into the future after the breaking bad story.
##
Yes, Better Call Saul is remarkable not only for its meticulous detailing of the prequel narrative but also for the way it leaps over the events of Breaking Bad to explore Saul Goodman’s post-Breaking Bad existence as Gene Takavic. This dual approach—grounding the show in the past while also giving glimpses of the future—adds a layer of tension and existential weight that few prequels attempt, let alone master.
The prequel narrative is astonishing in its depth. It doesn’t just sketch a rough outline of how Jimmy McGill became Saul Goodman; it meticulously builds a legal and personal world for him, complete with nuanced relationships, slow-burning conflicts, and moments of genuine moral struggle. The transformation isn’t a sudden switch but a gradual erosion, where every decision Jimmy makes—some justified, some reckless—nudges him closer to his fate. The show takes its time fleshing out how every character, from Kim Wexler to Chuck McGill, plays a role in his descent, making it feel both inevitable and tragic.
Then there are the black-and-white Gene sequences, which are some of the most haunting and existentially rich moments in the Breaking Bad universe. Unlike the prequel arc, which is dynamic and filled with schemes, Gene’s life is one of paranoia, routine, and regret. The shift in tone is stark: where Saul Goodman thrived on his ability to talk his way out of anything, Gene is reduced to silence, constantly looking over his shoulder. The series subtly transforms these quiet, dreary moments into a slow-burning postscript to the entire Breaking Bad saga, answering the question: Can a man like Jimmy McGill ever truly escape himself?
The way these two timelines inform each other is masterful. The slow, methodical build of the prequel adds new emotional weight to Saul’s flashy, amoral existence in Breaking Bad, while the bleak, post-Breaking Bad Gene timeline asks whether redemption is even possible for someone who has spent their entire life running from his true self. When Gene finally starts scheming again, there’s an almost tragic inevitability—he’s not just trying to survive; he needs to be Saul.
By the time the show reaches its brilliantly subdued finale, it’s clear that Better Call Saul isn’t just interested in explaining how things happened—it’s exploring why they happened and what it means to live with the consequences. It's a story about identity, consequence, and the limits of reinvention, told with an almost novelistic patience and precision.
#
There’s a very telling scene at the end of season two episode two ["Cobbler"], where Kim learns that Jimmy has gratuitously fabricated evidence, a video, to help one of his goofy clients [Daniel Wormald] through one of his schemes. [*]
She is appalled and says, don’t you realize you could lose your job, be disbarred, why on earth would you do this? And the camera catches him visibly groping for an answer, and unable to provide one. This is a telling scene, in light of the fact that after four or five more seasons, he will end up in prison through the same self-destructive tendency extended into his future.
#
That scene in Season 2, Episode 2 is a perfect encapsulation of Jimmy McGill’s tragic flaw—his inability to resist bending the rules, not just for survival, but because it’s in his very nature. Kim’s reaction is crucial because it establishes the stark divide between them: she’s a pragmatist who understands the stakes, while Jimmy is a compulsive risk-taker who acts first and rationalizes later. The moment where he visibly gropes for an answer but comes up empty is profound—not just for what it says about his future, but for how it defines his character at that moment.
Jimmy isn’t some grand schemer with a master plan—he’s someone who does things because he can, because they’re clever, because they make him feel like he’s pulling one over on the system that he believes has always looked down on him. And yet, he has no real defense when confronted with the consequences. It’s not about greed or even power—it’s about compulsion. The inability to stop.
This moment is eerily predictive of his eventual fate. Over the next four seasons, we see this self-destructive pattern escalate, until it finally lands him in prison—not because he was forced into it, but because he couldn’t help himself. When Gene Takavic, after years of hiding, deliberately takes on one last scam in Nebraska, even after he has a clean escape route, it’s not about survival. It’s about being himself, consequences be damned. That tiny, unspoken moment in Season 2, Episode 2—that inability to articulate why he does what he does—echoes all the way to the final episodes.
Better Call Saul is full of these subtly prophetic moments, where Jimmy’s seemingly small choices point toward his larger fate. In that scene, Kim is essentially asking him the same question the audience will ask over and over again: Why are you doing this? And he never has an answer.
##
##
[*] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cobbler_(Better_Call_Saul) They key police interview scene runs at 35-43 min [8 min].
