Tuesday, September 24, 2024

AI Revisits: Jarndyce v Jarndyce on Netflix

 


Write a novel treatment of Dickens' Bleak House, from the perspective of the law firms were enjoying decades of financial success based on the proceedings. It’s a bit like the comic play Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, which flip-flops the normal story of Hamlet.

###

Title: The Chancery Chronicles

Genre: Satirical Legal Drama

Tone: Wry, offbeat humor, inspired by the irreverent and quirky reframing seen in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead

Concept:

The Chancery Chronicles is a darkly comic exploration of the Bleak House universe from the perspective of the law firms profiting from the interminable legal case of Jarndyce and Jarndyce. The novel offers an absurdist, inside look at how the attorneys, clerks, and junior partners live comfortably off the slow churn of this epic litigation. While the world around them collapses under the weight of the case's futility, the law firms thrive, their offices expanding, and their careers secured in the wealth generated by the delays, complexities, and ever-growing stacks of paperwork.

Characters:

  1. Mr. Snubworthy: The head of Snubworthy & Partners, a prestigious law firm, who prides himself on turning delays into profits. A shrewd businessman disguised as a principled lawyer, he genuinely sees the Jarndyce case as his legacy, though it's unclear whether he’s more devoted to the law or the plush upholstery in his office.

  2. Mrs. Coddlestone: A senior partner and expert in inheritance law who thrives on pedantry. She secretly believes the case will never be resolved, and she meticulously catalogues every new complication with the satisfaction of someone updating a well-loved library.

  3. Tobias Plimpton: A junior lawyer who stumbles into Snubworthy & Partners fresh from law school, initially idealistic but quickly seduced by the easy money and endless luncheons. He narrates the story, slowly realizing that the firm's success depends entirely on keeping the case unresolved.

  4. Arnold Blemish: A veteran solicitor who’s been with the case since the early days and now considers Jarndyce his lifelong companion. He’s become a tragic-comic figure, unable to imagine life without the case to preoccupy him.

  5. The Clients: Various plaintiffs and distant Jarndyce relations, popping in and out of the narrative, each hoping for their windfall while completely unaware they are pawns in a greater scheme to extend the proceedings. They appear only as distractions to the lawyers, useful only for creating more paperwork.

Plot Summary:

The story begins with Tobias Plimpton's first day at Snubworthy & Partners, a well-established law firm thriving on the back of the notorious Jarndyce and Jarndyce case. Tobias, eager and fresh from school, is initially excited to work on a case of such grandeur. However, his enthusiasm quickly fades as he realizes that the case has been dragging on for decades, with no end in sight, and that's just the way the senior partners like it.

Through Tobias’s eyes, we witness the firm's daily operations: countless meetings where the goal is not progress but "strategic stagnation," frivolous filings, and endless debates over nonsensical legal minutiae, all designed to keep the case open as long as possible. We follow the law firm’s internal politics, where promotions are based not on merit but on how well you can add complexity to the case or delay proceedings with a well-timed procedural maneuver.

The narrative flips between moments of farce, where the absurdity of the legal system is laid bare, and moments of quiet reflection, as Tobias begins to understand the personal toll the case has taken on the families involved. Despite this, he too becomes complicit, swept up in the wealth and luxury that comes with extending the case indefinitely.

In a pivotal scene, Mr. Snubworthy hosts a lavish banquet celebrating the 20th anniversary of the firm’s involvement with the Jarndyce case. The event is framed as a momentous occasion, with speeches lauding the "continuing complexity" of the legal dispute. It’s a darkly comedic highlight, exposing the firm's utter detachment from the real-world impact of the case.

Key Themes:

  • The Absurdity of Bureaucracy: The novel highlights the ridiculousness of a legal system where the primary goal is not resolution but perpetuation, mirroring the endless delays in Bleak House but from the perspective of those profiting from them.

  • Morality vs. Profit: Tobias’s slow descent from idealistic newcomer to cynical participant reveals how easily moral compromise can be masked by professional success.

  • Time as Currency: Time in the novel is more valuable than any monetary inheritance. The longer the case drags on, the more secure the lawyers’ futures become, suggesting that the real inheritance in Jarndyce isn’t wealth but the endless pursuit of it.

  • Dark Humor: Much like Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, the novel uses dark, offbeat humor to show how major tragedies (like the ruin of families) are mere background noise to those benefiting from them.

Resolution:

In the final act, just as it seems that a breakthrough in the case is imminent—a missing will is discovered, which might finally settle the matter—Snubworthy & Partners go into crisis mode. The partners scramble to find ways to discredit the will or introduce new parties to the case to delay the proceedings further. Tobias, now fully entrenched in the firm’s cynical practices, leads the charge to create new complications, ensuring that the case will continue for at least another decade.

The novel ends on a satirical note, with Tobias Plimpton being promoted to senior partner for his "brilliant contribution" to the firm's future. Meanwhile, the Jarndyce heirs continue to live in misery, unaware that their inheritance has already been drained dry by the system.

Style:

The narrative is filled with witty, cutting dialogue and surreal, Kafkaesque moments that highlight the farcical nature of the legal profession when it becomes more about self-perpetuation than justice. While the story maintains a light, satirical tone, it is underscored by a deep critique of institutional inertia and the human cost of a system designed for profit over people.


###

The novel, as you have described, it, has been a fine success. Netflix has optioned it as a six part, six hour miniseries. You were an excellent and wry screenwriter, provide a treatment for the six hour, six part miniseries.

###

Title: The Chancery Chronicles

Format: Six-part, six-hour miniseries (Netflix)

Tone: Wry, offbeat legal satire, inspired by the absurdist humor of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead and the bureaucratic nightmare of Bleak House. Each episode balances dark humor with social commentary, diving into the world of profit-driven legal processes.

Episode Guide


Episode 1: “The Golden Goose”

Plot Summary:
The series opens with Tobias Plimpton, a young, idealistic lawyer, starting his first day at Snubworthy & Partners, a well-established firm with a major client: the centuries-long inheritance dispute, Jarndyce and Jarndyce. Tobias quickly realizes that this case, while famously convoluted, has become the firm’s greatest asset. We meet the eccentric partners, led by the self-satisfied Mr. Snubworthy, and the case's key players, all of whom see Jarndyce as an endless fountain of revenue.

Key Scenes:

  • Tobias's Orientation: An onboarding scene where Tobias is introduced to the case's history, full of humor as the senior partners praise the endless complexity of Jarndyce with a reverence usually reserved for religious artifacts.
  • The Partners' Banquet: A lavish celebration of the case’s 200th year, attended by the firm’s elite. Tobias gets a glimpse into the life of luxury that comes with profiting off of delay.

Themes:

  • The dehumanization of justice when it becomes driven by profit.
  • Tobias’s slow realization that the firm is more interested in perpetuation than resolution.

Episode 2: “The Fine Print”

Plot Summary:
Tobias settles into the mundane, procedural grind of the firm. His idealism starts to crack as he is assigned menial tasks that only serve to delay the case. We see the firm’s internal culture thrive on complexity and inefficiency, and Tobias’s small victories in court are celebrated not for their legal importance but for how much longer they will drag out proceedings.

Key Scenes:

  • Client Consultation: Tobias meets a desperate Jarndyce heir, full of hope for a resolution, only to witness the firm’s senior lawyers subtly encourage more litigation, crafting a Kafkaesque strategy to avoid progress.
  • Mr. Snubworthy's Lecture: A humorous but cutting monologue from Snubworthy about the art of "strategic stalling," in which he explains that the goal isn’t to win but to "keep the wheels turning."

Themes:

  • The absurdity of legal bureaucracy.
  • Tobias’s growing internal conflict as he becomes complicit in perpetuating the firm’s profit-driven motives.

Episode 3: “The Paper Trail”

Plot Summary:
The story delves deeper into the firm’s day-to-day operations as Tobias is assigned to draft new motions that do nothing but stall the case further. Meanwhile, the firm’s clerks and paralegals joke about how many generations of their families have worked on Jarndyce, turning the office into a strange, self-sustaining machine of pointless paperwork. Tobias begins to form a friendship with Mrs. Coddlestone, a senior partner who believes the case will outlive them all.

Key Scenes:

  • Office Gossip: A scene where paralegals discuss the firm’s long history with the case, poking fun at the idea that it might ever be resolved. Tobias listens in, his disillusionment growing.
  • Mrs. Coddlestone’s Files: Tobias discovers a hidden room in the office filled with decades of old documents, many of which contradict each other, adding to the sense of absurdity.

Themes:

  • The satire of a legal system built to sustain itself.
  • The idea that generations are trapped in the cycle of the same case.

Episode 4: “The Clock Ticks On”

Plot Summary:
As Tobias’s involvement deepens, he is tasked with more significant responsibilities, including attending court hearings where nothing ever seems to get decided. The absurd length of the case is highlighted as each new hearing only serves to add another layer of delay. Tobias's frustration grows, but he also finds himself enjoying the luxury that comes with his new position. We see the more personal costs of Jarndyce on the plaintiffs, as their lives are torn apart while the lawyers grow wealthy.

Key Scenes:

  • The Courtroom: A comically slow and indecisive hearing where each new argument seems to spawn five more, to the joy of the legal teams.
  • Tobias’s Moral Quandary: In a quiet moment, Tobias reflects on the human toll of the case, but the lure of success keeps him from taking action.

Themes:

  • The human cost of an indifferent legal system.
  • The conflict between personal success and moral responsibility.

Episode 5: “The Will That Wasn't”

Plot Summary:
A twist occurs when an old document, possibly a final will, is discovered in the archives of Snubworthy & Partners. This will could potentially resolve Jarndyce and Jarndyce. The partners go into panic mode, devising plans to discredit or delay the will's entry into the case. Tobias, now fully embedded in the firm’s culture, is tasked with finding a way to keep the will out of court—his first big test in strategic stalling.

Key Scenes:

  • The Will Discovery: A dramatic moment where Tobias stumbles across the will in the firm’s archive, only to be celebrated for keeping it hidden.
  • Snubworthy's Strategy Meeting: A darkly comedic scene where the partners brainstorm ridiculous ways to invalidate the will, turning what should be a moment of justice into farce.

Themes:

  • The fragility of justice when profit is the motive.
  • Tobias’s increasing moral compromise as he becomes complicit in perpetuating the system.

Episode 6: “The Legacy”

Plot Summary:
In the final episode, the firm succeeds in stalling the resolution of the will, and the case continues. Tobias is promoted to senior partner for his "contributions" to the delay. The series ends with a lavish party celebrating yet another decade of Jarndyce and Jarndyce, with hints that the next generation of lawyers will carry on the same tradition. Tobias, now fully part of the firm’s machine, reflects on how far he’s come—and how much he’s lost.

Key Scenes:

  • The Promotion: Tobias is welcomed into the ranks of senior partner, his moral descent complete, with a final ironic toast to the "immortal case."
  • The Final Party: A mirrored scene from the first episode, where Tobias now celebrates the ongoing nature of the case, realizing the cyclical nature of the firm's success.

Themes:

  • The perpetuation of a corrupt system across generations.
  • The moral ambiguity of success.

Overall Tone and Style:

The miniseries balances sharp satire with absurd humor. Each episode underscores the ridiculousness of the legal profession's self-perpetuating nature, echoing the tone of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead by making a darkly comic farce out of a serious legal tragedy. Viewers witness how personal ambition and systemic inertia fuel the legal process, with moments of introspective quiet countered by humorous, absurdist takes on legal jargon and procedure.

Visual Style:

The sets are rich and opulent, contrasting with the dreariness of the courtrooms and archives, highlighting the dissonance between the lawyers’ prosperity and the decaying case they manage. Visual metaphors—like endless stacks of papers, clocks that never seem to move, and decaying legal tomes—emphasize the sense of time being both meaningless and profitable.


###

Prompt for illustration (top).  Please illustrate a cover for the binder we will use to distribute the treatment.