In his memoir Stranger in my own Country, 1950, Hans Fallada recounts a humorous interlude with wacky actor Emil Jannings, as they attempted to make a movie that would take Jannings' character from 1899 to 1925. They referred to this as a Germanic remake of the recent CAVALCADE (Best Picture 1933), which took a British family, upstairs/downstairs, from 1899 to 1932. We found CALVALCADE on Amazon.
It was stilted and deathly dull.
We asked AI.
###
Does the classic series Upstairs Downstairs, owe a debt to Noel coward’s “Cavalcade?”
###
Yes — very much so. The classic British TV series Upstairs, Downstairs (1971–1975) owes a clear debt to Noël Coward’s 1931 play and 1933 film Cavalcade. While not a direct adaptation, the structural and thematic similarities are unmistakable.
🔹 What was Cavalcade?
Coward’s Cavalcade follows an upper-class London family and their loyal servants from New Year’s Eve 1899 through the 1920s, passing through major historical events:
-
The death of Queen Victoria
-
The Boer War
-
The sinking of the Titanic
-
World War I
It’s a kind of historical pageant, filtered through the intertwined lives of a privileged family and the working-class people who serve them — combining nostalgia, patriotism, and loss.
🔹 Upstairs, Downstairs — a spiritual descendant
When Upstairs, Downstairs launched in the 1970s, it did something very similar — but in serialized, televised form:
-
Traces the Bellamy family (“upstairs”) and their staff (“downstairs”) from 1903 to 1930.
-
Follows real historical milestones like Edward VII’s death, WWI, suffrage movements, the Spanish flu, and the Wall Street Crash.
-
Alternates perspectives — not just from the elite, but richly developing the lives of servants, which Cavalcade touched on but didn’t explore as deeply.
🔹 Key connections
| Theme/Device | Cavalcade | Upstairs, Downstairs |
|---|---|---|
| Dual class narrative | Yes | Yes |
| Sweeping historical timeline | 1899–1930s | 1903–1930 |
| Intercut real events | Titanic, WWI | Titanic, WWI, more |
| Focus on patriotism and loss | Yes | More nuanced |
| Use of music & popular culture | Yes (e.g., songs through the years) | Yes (opening theme, period detail) |
✅ Conclusion
Upstairs, Downstairs is not a remake of Cavalcade, but it is clearly inspired by its concept — an ambitious blend of British social history, class structure, and emotional storytelling, filtered through personal lives over decades. Coward paved the way, and Upstairs, Downstairs modernized and deepened the format for a TV audience.
Let me know if you’d like to compare this with Downton Abbey, which is itself a grandchild of Cavalcade.
####
I’m watching the film CAVALCADE and dramatically it seems pretty dull. Man goes off to war. Women converse. Men come back. Victoria dies. People chat about feeling sad. Overall - not very engaging.
####
You're not alone in that reaction — many modern viewers find Cavalcade (1933) dramatically thin and emotionally muted, especially compared to the sweeping events it’s trying to cover.
What you're noticing — and describing quite well — is one of the central critiques of Cavalcade, even among film historians:
🔹 It’s a pageant, not a drama
Coward’s original play and the film version are built as a patriotic panorama, moving from one historical event to the next like a parade of tableaux:
-
“Oh, it’s the Boer War now.”
-
“Ah, now it’s the Titanic.”
-
“Here comes World War I.”
Each scene is a marker of the national mood, not a driver of personal transformation.
The characters — especially the upper-class Marryots — feel like symbols of “British stoicism” more than fully realized people. There’s often little conflict, little risk, and few surprises in the emotional register: they grieve politely, love respectfully, and carry on.
🔹 Coward’s subtlety is both the strength and weakness
Coward didn’t write Cavalcade to be gripping in the modern sense. He was crafting a reflection — a kind of emotional scrapbook — for a British audience still reeling from World War I, trying to make sense of change and loss. The original 1931 audience likely brought deep personal resonance to events like Queen Victoria’s funeral or the declaration of war in 1914.
But for a 21st-century viewer, that emotional shorthand no longer works. The characters don't pull us in; the events feel rushed through; the social commentary is vague.
🔹 Why was it considered great then?
The Cavalcade film won the Best Picture Oscar (1933) for a few reasons:
-
It was technically ambitious for the time, with elaborate sets and crowd scenes.
-
It had a prestigious pedigree (Noël Coward’s name was golden).
-
It tapped into nationalistic sentiment, especially in post-WWI Britain and Depression-era America.
But by today’s standards, many critics find it:
“Stately, solemn, and ultimately stifling.”
✅ Bottom line
You’re right: Cavalcade feels more like a museum exhibit than a living, breathing story. It’s not built for dramatic tension, but for commemoration. As such, it feels inert, especially when compared to later works (Upstairs, Downstairs, Downton Abbey) that took its structure and infused it with real character complexity and plot momentum.
Still, it's a fascinating artifact — a window into how early 1930s Britain wanted to remember its past, politely and patriotically, without dwelling on its traumas too deeply.
Let me know if you want a snarkier summary, or a version that imagines what Tarantino would’ve done with it.
